place

Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill

20th-century Church of England church buildingsChurch of England church buildings in WiltshireEnglish churches dedicated to St AlbanGrade II listed churches in Wiltshire
Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill geograph.org.uk 1621171
Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill geograph.org.uk 1621171

The Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr is a Church of England church in Larkhill, Wiltshire, England.

Excerpt from the Wikipedia article Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill (License: CC BY-SA 3.0, Authors, Images).

Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill
The Packway,

Geographical coordinates (GPS) Address External links Nearby Places
placeShow on map

Wikipedia: Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, LarkhillContinue reading on Wikipedia

Geographical coordinates (GPS)

Latitude Longitude
N 51.1971 ° E -1.8067 °
placeShow on map

Address

Garrison Church of St Alban

The Packway
SP4 8QP , Durrington
England, United Kingdom
mapOpen on Google Maps

linkWikiData (Q26677478)
linkOpenStreetMap (38059782)

Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill geograph.org.uk 1621171
Garrison Church of St Alban the Martyr, Larkhill geograph.org.uk 1621171
Share experience

Nearby Places

Stonehenge Avenue
Stonehenge Avenue

Stonehenge Avenue is an ancient avenue on Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, England. It is part of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites UNESCO World Heritage Site. Discovered in the 18th century, it measures nearly 3 kilometres, and connects Stonehenge with the River Avon. It was built during the Stonehenge 3 period of 2600 to 1700 BCE. Along some of its length, the avenue is aligned with the sunrise of the summer solstice, suggesting a time of most frequent use. In 2013 a section of A344 road was closed, which had cut through the avenue close to Stonehenge. After the road surface was removed, it was shown that although the avenue's banks had been sliced off, the filled-in ditches were still in evidence, confirming that the avenue continued through to the stone circle.At the end of the avenue, a ring of pits, referred to as Bluestonehenge, was discovered in 2009. No monoliths were found, and stone chips which were assumed to be of bluestone were later found to bear no relation to the bluestones at Stonehenge.Natural ice age grooves called periglacial stripes are present in the ground underneath the avenue. Mike Parker Pearson of the Stonehenge Riverside Project believes that the avenue was inspired by, and built over the top of, this existing natural formation of parallel rills which had a significant astronomical alignment. The presence of ridges and gullies that happened to line up with the solstice directions may have been venerated, leading the Neolithic people to later build Stonehenge at this particular site.The avenue, along with Stonehenge itself, is a scheduled monument, first designated in the 1882 act which was the earliest legislation to protect British archaeological sites.

Aubrey holes
Aubrey holes

The Aubrey holes are a ring of 56 chalk pits at Stonehenge, named after seventeenth-century antiquarian John Aubrey. They date to the earliest phases of Stonehenge in the late fourth and early third millennium BC. Despite decades of argument and analysis, their purpose is still unknown, although an astronomical role has often been suggested. Whilst visiting the monument in 1666, Aubrey noticed five circular cavities in the ground and noted them in his records. These features were ignored or not seen by the later antiquarians to investigate the site, and it was not until the 1920s during the work carried out by Colonel William Hawley that Hawley's assistant Robert Newall identified a ring of pits he named in honour of Aubrey and his early survey. The depressions seen by Aubrey himself are more likely to have been different features from those that now bear his name. Mike Pitts in a 1981 article in Nature pointed out that the holes had been backfilled thousands of years before Aubrey visited the site. The presence of later cremation burials and sarsen stone chips in the holes' upper fills supports this. That none of the other antiquarians who visited the site noticed any such holes implies that they were not permanent features either. Pitts argues that they were more likely to be the cavities left by features that had recently been removed. He has suggested that perhaps further megaliths stood at Stonehenge which occupied these other holes and are now lost.