place

Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad

Hospitals in AhmedabadIndian hospital stubsNarayana HealthUse Indian English from November 2018Year of establishment missing

Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad is a tertiary care hospital in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, which treats patients in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan. The hospital is a part of Narayana Health group, (formerly known as Narayana Hrudyalaya Private Limited) headquartered in Bengaluru, which was founded in 2012 by cardiac surgeon Dr. Devi Prasad Shetty in 2001.It provides pediatric and adult cardiac care, neurology, orthopaedics, nephrology and urology, obstetrics and gynaecology, general medicine, ear nose and throat, paediatrics and neonatology, pulmonology, orthopaedics and oncology.It has a digital catheterisation laboratory, a coronary care unit, and an intensive therapy unit. For conditions like disc prolapse, spinal fractures and spinal tumors, the neurosciences department offers minimally invasive spine surgery and microsurgery, and the orthopaedics department provides replacement surgery for knee, hip and shoulder.

Excerpt from the Wikipedia article Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad (License: CC BY-SA 3.0, Authors).

Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad
Rakhial Road, Ahmedabad Pratapnagar

Geographical coordinates (GPS) Address Website Nearby Places
placeShow on map

Wikipedia: Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, AhmedabadContinue reading on Wikipedia

Geographical coordinates (GPS)

Latitude Longitude
N 23.022424 ° E 72.623402 °
placeShow on map

Address

Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital

Rakhial Road
380009 Ahmedabad, Pratapnagar
Gujarat, India
mapOpen on Google Maps

Website
narayanahealth.org

linkVisit website

Share experience

Nearby Places

Amraiwadi

Amraiwadi is an area located in Ahmedabad, India.Amraiwadi is located in the eastern segment of the city, which has historically developed as an industrial area; since the beginning of the 20th century the cotton textile mills were located there and later the new industrial estates housing small scale industries. While the cotton textile mills were typical Fordian welfare units, with organized and well paid labour force housed in employee housing, the small scale industrial units were typically unorganized manufacturing. The textile mill housing was referred to as chawls, which are single room dwelling units laid in a row and provided with common water and sanitation facilities. East Ahmedabad is marked by such low-income housing units. The workers of the unorganized manufacturing units begun to live in informal settlements, either developed as squatter settlements or informally subdivided private lands coming under various reservations of the city's Development Plan (DP) or for acquisition under the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act (ULCRA),1976. Such settlements developed on a large scale in this segment because of the demand from this industrial working class who typically desired a house close to their workplace. Such informal and squatter settlements developed on a large scale in the 1980s and 1990s. Another significant phenomenon occurred during the late 1980s and early 1990s; the cotton textile mills went into decline and closed down. But, their chawls remained and continued to house the former cotton textile mill workers. The parent unit, the textile mill has closed down and the residents of these chawls no longer being the employees of the mills, the mill owners were not interested in maintaining such dwellings. Since these chawls were under rent control legislation, the owners could not increase the rents. The owners therefore did not renovate the chawls where conditions deteriorated into slum type of housing. A few chawl owners offered the occupants to purchase their dwelling units so that the former could get rid of the burden and such transactions indeed took place in many chawls. In our fieldwork, we have come across several instances where a few dwelling unit occupants had not purchased the units when the majority had. In all, the land tenure arrangements became complex. In some cases where the owners stopped collecting the rents and the occupiers became the de facto owner.